NME Reviews

We Are Scientists

Brain Thrust Mastery // Virgin

If a good sense of humour is indeed mankind’s last line of defence against a crumbling universe, there can be few bands as adept at dodging the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune as We Are Scientists. When our sun implodes and all we know on Earth dies, you can bet that Keith Murray and Chris Cain will be breathing nitrous oxide in an underground bunker, laughing their tits off as they dictate another pithy press release about spending the last year in a fat camp, a drying-out clinic and a race-car school. Yet, for all their willful irreverence – and how else can you describe staging self-help seminars before your gigs? – there’s nothing especially funny about WAS’ music. No, what WAS specialise in is fun.

‘Brain Thrust Mastery’, their second major-label effort, positions them somewhere between a floppy-fringed, indie-pop Foo Fighters and a dive bar Duran Duran – which, by the sounds of things, is exactly where they want to be. ‘Ghouls’ might open proceedings with a malaise of throbbing claustrophobia, but even amid its ho-humness you can still practically see the tunes approaching over the Crayola-hued horizon. Going by the sum of its parts, ‘After Hours’ – a playful, chirpy love song to a lock-in – shouldn’t amount to much, and yet its four minutes coast by on a wave of pure charm. That’s nothing, however, compared to ‘Lethal Enforcer’, a Pimms-drinking, shoulderpad-sporting beast that lurks underneath lampposts surrounded by dry ice and cigarette smoke, staring at attractive women longingly and trying to be Spandau Ballet. That’s just fucking awesome.

Continuing in this vein is ‘Chick Lit’, a ruffle-collared slice of pure electro-pop filth that you’ll be sweating beer out of your bloodstream to on a weekly basis should they get around to releasing it as a single. Even if the skronk of distant saxophones on ‘That’s What Counts’ is questionable, it wasn’t enough to put us off its breezy, cheesy, circa-1983 aceness. However, if rolled-up dinner jacket sleeves and capsized yachts aren’t your thing, fret not. There’s more than enough twitchy good-time rock’n’roll here to tide you over. The picks of which are ‘Impatience’, with its lung-bursting chorus and building-block drums and the jerky, infectious ‘Let’s See It’.

WAS seem to understand the inherent ridiculousness of being in a rock’n’roll band, and even appear to revel in it. Just because ‘Brain Thrust Mastery’ doesn’t attempt to shoehorn some hamfisted social commentary or poverty-ending rhetoric into its 11 tracks doesn’t make it lightweight indie fluff; far from it – We Are Scientists are serious about having fun.

7 out of 10

Comments (4)

Add a comment

colmbudgie 

Mar 20, 2008

at first listen i was kinda disappointed. i was expecting a With Love and Squalor Part 2. they sound like a completely different band here.

but, its grown on me. theres something strangely appealing about the acoustic guitars and keyboards, i dont know what. i think the album is really good. definitely deserves a good few listens.

i give it an 8

vic.chan 

Mar 23, 2008

I agree, when I first heard the tracks it was completely different. I like change though.

I think you just get use to it more you hear it rather than hating it. I think you get more addicted to it as well. It is a collection of different music styles. Every track has something to give but its not all over the place, it is solid.

You can see the range of Keith's vocals plus I think this album is more creative.

brooklynbrett 

Mar 26, 2008

We'd be talking about WAS as a one-trick pony if they hadn't flirted with some new stylings. It wasn't the old sound that we fell in love with, it was the song-writing. They have all the same chord-changes and quirks that make WAS a blast to listen to. They've just matured without losing their edge. "Tonight" is my favorite track.

thekillersandthewombats 

May 26, 2008

This album is so different to the last i dont know which i like more theyre too different to compare its like comparing Hot Fuss and Sams town. Well its not cos thats like comparing perfection to perfection whereas both WAS albums arnt quite perfection. None the less great album

Add your comment

NME Alerts

Get NME news delivered direct to your desktop. Find out more

This Week's Issue
  • NME Magazine - The ultimate guide to the week in music
  • The ultimate guide to the week in music
  • NME Magazine - Subscribe today and get 1/3rd off NME
Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Register with MyNME

Every Tuesday and Friday

  • Up-to-the-minute news stories
  • The best new music and free downloads
  • Video interviews, photo galleries, competitions and more
  • Album and track reviews for the week ahead
  • Essential gigs in your area