NME News

Crystal Castles accused of 'stealing' samples

Crystal Castles                                                                       Pic: Tom Oxley

Crystal Castles Pic: Tom Oxley

Band respond to allegations regarding early songs

Following on from the story in this week's NME (cover date June 21) about Crystal Castles' alleged use of other people's images and samples without permission, further details have emerged about the furore surrounding sampling in some of the band's earliest songs.

Pitchfork reports that members of the 8bitpeoples Collective, who make 'chip music' inspired by classic video game sounds, are claiming that the band have used their music against the terms of its use.

The collective regularly post free downloads of chip artists' music on its website and allows free copying, distribution and transmission of the works so long as the person using it attributes the original, doesn't alter it, and doesn't use it for commercial purposes.

8bitpeoples have alleged that Crystal Castles have "violated every term of the licence" by using music by chip artists Lo-Bat and Covox in some of their early songs, which have subsequently appeared online.

Crystal Castles' Ethan Kath responded by admitting to the sampling but explained that they just occurred when he was experimenting on early demos and were never intended for commercial use.

"These infringing songs are early unreleased tracks which were never performed," he said. "They are the most awful tracks associated with the band and Alice [Glass, singer] herself hasn't heard most of these tracks. I put these tracks together myself and then discarded them because I thought they were too poor for release."

Comments (2)

Add a comment

the_royal_wee 

Jun 18, 2008

the haters can't take it away from crystal castles: their album is incredible and they are devastatingly good live. get over it and stop picking at their success, samples disputes are for The Beatles and suits at major labels, not music created in 2008

edison_carter 

Jun 20, 2008

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong royal_wee. I do dig the Castles; however, if this article is accurate, then CC should just admit that they disregarded the Creative Commons License, give the credit (or chuck the tracks) and that's it. If there's more to it than that, they should step up and fix the situation if they want to keep performing anything that utitlizes someone's material that they inapproprately used. Just because you want everything to be freely accessible to everybody in any case doesn't mean everyone wants that. I think the Creative Commons licenses are cool, and they encourage sharing of material, but not everyone wants their stuff used for someone else's commercial gain, and at least if the the license says give credit, then freaking give credit where it is due. How hard is that?It's way easier than say, making Paul's Boutique. Dang.

Add your comment

NME Alerts

Get NME news delivered direct to your desktop. Find out more

This Week's Issue
  • NME Magazine - The ultimate guide to the week in music
  • The ultimate guide to the week in music
  • NME Magazine - Subscribe today and get 1/3rd off NME
Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Register with MyNME

Every Tuesday and Friday

  • Up-to-the-minute news stories
  • The best new music and free downloads
  • Video interviews, photo galleries, competitions and more
  • Album and track reviews for the week ahead
  • Essential gigs in your area

Crystal Castles CDs